Latest Comments

Guest - Aislinn Dyestuff Citizen Science.
09. Oktober 2026
This is a great project. I look forward to the results. Thanks for letting us know.
Guest - Aislinn Time for...
09. Oktober 2026
Looks delicious!
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
18. September 2026
Hi Rachel, I have looked for more photos of you, but that was not very successful. I found a link on...
Guest - Beatrix Sprang Discussion
15. September 2026
That lozenge pattern element is not a photograph, but a scan. So it should be to scale. But I pinned...
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
15. September 2026
I was not referring to Rachel's reconstruction (is the reconstruction you refer to the one photograp...

Wool Combs.

So... let's return to the wool prep proper, and in particular: Wool combs!

Here's the basis on wool comb using: You have a pair of them, used together. Wool is placed on the tines of one of the combs, then gets transferred onto the second one, straightening and aligning the fibre in the process. Dust, debris and short cuts either fall out during the process as well or can be removed relatively easily. Once everything is aligned nicely, the wool can be drawn off, ready to be used.

There are several different ways that can be used to transfer the fibre from one comb to the other; most of them involve holding the combs so the tines are perpendicular. While it is possible to work with one comb held in each hand, most images also show one comb as fixed somewhere, and only one held in the hands to work with.

Modern wool combs are used in a similar way; usually, there's some combing station or pad included with them (unless it's very small ones) or available to go with them. One comb is held in that station, and the other is used to work, held in the hand(s). If you look on youtube, there's (of course!) a number of combing videos and tutorials. (Note, also, that modern wool combs may have several rows of tines, and very frequently have two; the medieval ones I know of have only one row of tines.)

This medieval-style version can be seen on a number of images, showing the process in more or less detail, and a more or less, hm, trustworthy way. For instance, the British Library manuscript pic here has a woman combing in a setup that has one comb looking like it's held by, as we in Germany would say, "Siemens Lufthaken" - an invisible device holding anything at any place. (Hard to get, unfortunately. Let me know if you have a source.)

Much more detailed, and looking a good bit closer to actual life, are two images from the Hausbuch der Mendelschen Zwölfbrüderstiftung - one here, and the second one here. The images date from the 15th century.

In both cases, one of the combs is held in the hands of the worker, while the other is fixed in some contraption: A stool-like support for the t-bar holding the tines, and an upright pole coming out of the floor or fixed to the floor, a bit further away, forming a brace for the end of the handle. This far, we're still in sort of a similar vein as modern combing. Both modern and medieval images show the worker in front of the fixed comb's tines, the handle pointing away from the worker.
However... modern combs are fixed in a way that allows the worker to stand or sit in front of the tines of the fixed comb, yet work towards oneself. The wool is pulled through the tines on the far side of the handle (close to the worker), towards the worker. This only works when the comb is fixed very firmly, though, and in a way that will bear the force of combing (which is not to be underestimated!).

Logically, and very obviously with the medieval setup, that work direction will not work - the comb could slide away from its brace and support towards the worker. Maybe there is some additional way to help the comb sit properly on its support - but it might not be necessary as the work direction is quite clearly adapted to the bracing construction: Both workers in the Hausbuch images use the hand-held comb on the far side of the tines, the handle side. Which obviously means they work away from themselves, not towards themselves.

This... is intriguing. I haven't gotten around to try this setup properly yet, but I can definitely tell you it feels very different from the "modern" wool combing, where you have full freedom downwards with your working comb, as the fixed one is clamped to the front of its support. This might mean some other technique for medieval-style combing is necessary. It will definitely be very quick and easy to switch the fixed and the handheld comb with such a construction, though.

If you know of more combing pictures, I'd love to hear about them. And of course if you have wool combs and try this out, please do let me know about your results!

 
0
Almost weekend!
Wool Prep Rambling Thoughts.
 

Comments 4

Miriam Griffiths on Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2020 20:13

That's just ... I've looked at those images probably hundreds of times. HOW have I never noticed the difference in working direction before!?

That's just ... I've looked at those images probably hundreds of times. HOW have I never noticed the difference in working direction before!?
Katrin on Freitag, 24. Juli 2020 11:49

Oh, how well do I know that phenomenon... sometimes you think you see exactly what is there, having seen an image a thousand times, and then suddenly you have to look at it differently due to some reason and you realise that you had never noticed a crucial detail. I also only noticed it a few weeks ago, in spite of having seen them often enough before!
It actually does help to do something like an image description, as in "write down what is shown in the picture". We had to do that back in school, and I never understood why you'd need an exercise like this until much, much later when doing it for research publications and realised that yes, you do look differently at the picture when doing this.

Oh, how well do I know that phenomenon... sometimes you think you see exactly what is there, having seen an image a thousand times, and then suddenly you have to look at it differently due to some reason and you realise that you had never noticed a crucial detail. I also only noticed it a few weeks ago, in spite of having seen them often enough before! It actually does help to do something like an image description, as in "write down what is shown in the picture". We had to do that back in school, and I never understood why you'd need an exercise like this until much, much later when doing it for research publications and realised that yes, you do look differently at the picture when doing this.
Diane (website) on Mittwoch, 19. August 2020 13:34

Hi Katrin,

your remark that "medieval" wool combs only have one row of teeth seemed a little puzzling to me. I've been researching Viking Age wool combs for some time now and there are several archaeological finds of combs with two rows. You might want to have a look at those. I've written an article on the topic which you can find here: https://vidars-horde.de/a-fur-artikel/wollkamme-in-der-wikingerzeit-die-fundlage

Hi Katrin, your remark that "medieval" wool combs only have one row of teeth seemed a little puzzling to me. I've been researching Viking Age wool combs for some time now and there are several archaeological finds of combs with two rows. You might want to have a look at those. I've written an article on the topic which you can find here: https://vidars-horde.de/a-fur-artikel/wollkamme-in-der-wikingerzeit-die-fundlage
Katrin on Dienstag, 15. September 2020 14:54

Diane, thank you for your comment and your link! That is a very interesting article indeed
I'd love to know more about some of the finds, especially those from Denmark where it's not entirely clear whether they had one or two rows.

The evidence I had seen was mostly from later times than Viking age, and I found single-row combs both on images and in archaeological finds. This is definitely worth a closer look, maybe there's a change over time? (Or I have just not come across the double-row examples.)

It's would also be very interesting to try out how well different tine lengths and arrangements are suited to different combing techniques, or to working wool vs. linen. When I'm combing wool and happened to put too much fibre onto the tines at once, I always run out of tine length space. If the tools with 6-7 cm tine length were used for combing wool, a different combing technique than what I usually do might be necessary. Have you worked with this type of combs?

Diane, thank you for your comment and your link! That is a very interesting article indeed :) I'd love to know more about some of the finds, especially those from Denmark where it's not entirely clear whether they had one or two rows. The evidence I had seen was mostly from later times than Viking age, and I found single-row combs both on images and in archaeological finds. This is definitely worth a closer look, maybe there's a change over time? (Or I have just not come across the double-row examples.) It's would also be very interesting to try out how well different tine lengths and arrangements are suited to different combing techniques, or to working wool vs. linen. When I'm combing wool and happened to put too much fibre onto the tines at once, I always run out of tine length space. If the tools with 6-7 cm tine length were used for combing wool, a different combing technique than what I usually do might be necessary. Have you worked with this type of combs?
Already Registered? Login Here
Freitag, 16. Oktober 2026

Related Posts

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://pallia.net/

Kontakt