Hallo, I'm here from pearl's journal, and hope you love to chat about finicky details on garments as much as I do.
So is this seam similar to the way some of the hose in the museum of London "textiles & clothing" book are constructed? (except the hose has running and overcast/whip stitch).
This method is near impossible to do by machine, but I've actually made a pair of hose with both sides in overcast stitch by mistake. I noticed that my fabric frayed less if my stitches were perpendicular to the seam on the cut side and diagonal on the other side. The opposite appears to be true of the stitching in your photo. (but then again, my fabric had more fabric than I'd prefer, and was on the very curved portions of the hose foot.
Anyway, while sewing this I found the easiest way to sew was to sew one side, then turn over and sew the other side. (Always sewing on the side with the cut edge visible). I notice in the photo that the stitches are prominent on the cut edge, but much less so for the other line of stitching. Do you think this is evidence for this garment being sewn this way? Did you get to see the other side of the garment? Did the seams look the same from the other side?
This seam type doesn't seem as strong as some types to me - the edge is exposed to fraying, (unless it fulls a lot which I can't see in the photo) and the stitches can pull out by fraying the fabric. Are the high stress areas (eg armholes) constructed in the same way? How do these seams stand up to wear and tear in your recreations?
Finally, if the garment has some badly reconstructed bits, how many seams are original?
I hope you don't take offense at this, I love people asking me hard questions about my garment theories, because they make me think, and reconsider. And thanks for making some of this material more available to us!
Rebecca, you are very welcome. And I know there are people out there like you, who know German, but there are also those who don't. And I've just been at the non-understanding-language end too many times not to feel self-conscious about that.
Teffania, yes please details details details! I'll answer your questions in today's post, so it doesn't get lost in the comments section.