Latest Comments

Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
18 September 2026
Hi Rachel, I have looked for more photos of you, but that was not very successful. I found a link on...
Guest - Beatrix Sprang Discussion
15 September 2026
That lozenge pattern element is not a photograph, but a scan. So it should be to scale. But I pinned...
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
15 September 2026
I was not referring to Rachel's reconstruction (is the reconstruction you refer to the one photograp...
Guest - Beatrix Sprang Discussion
14 September 2026
There is something Rachel did not mention. She told me: "Well, I worked with the measurements we too...
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
14 September 2026
Well, this is certainly developing into an interesting discussion. Firstly, going from that lovely l...

Sad news.

As an archaeologist, I get itchy when I see any original finds on sale anywhere. Itchy, and sometimes also a little bit angry, and always a good bit sad. Removing finds, taking them out of the soil, destroys irrevocally some knowledge that we could have gained about an area, a find spot, a development. This can be true even if they were stray finds that turn up on top of a field that had been ploughed.

Selling original artefacts supports the market for original artefacts. It does not matter where they come from, and it does not matter whether they are expensive or cheap, stray finds or not - everyone that buys or sells artefacts strengthens the market, and the stronger the market is, the more attention it gets, the more treasure hunters will go and try to find (and sell) stuff.

This destroys archaeological sites. It can even destroy more - such as this Roman bridge in Bulgaria that collapsed due to treasure hunters trying to find a gold treasure supposedly buried at or near the bridge.

I am out of words about this. Our world is one Roman bridge poorer because some people know no boundaries in their greed for treasure. Sometimes, I have a hard time to believe in humanity.
0
Friday Linky Stuff Round-Up.
News from Lyon.
 

Comments 1

Catherine Raymond (website) on Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:41

It *is* sad. It may even be the case that there is no treasure (or that any treasure was taken in antiquity), so that the destruction may not only have been caused by greed, but may have been pointless even from the treasure hunters' view.

I just ran across an article with a different kind of sad news. It's about the ruin of a 9th century CE castle in Spain that was crudely "restored" with concrete: you can read the article here>.

It *is* sad. It may even be the case that there is no treasure (or that any treasure was taken in antiquity), so that the destruction may not only have been caused by greed, but may have been pointless even from the treasure hunters' view. I just ran across an article with a different kind of sad news. It's about the ruin of a 9th century CE castle in Spain that was crudely "restored" with concrete: you can read the article here>.
Already Registered? Login Here
Monday, 21 September 2026

Related Posts

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://pallia.net/

Contact