Latest Comments

Miriam Griffiths Very Old Spindle Whorls?
22 November 2024
Agree with you that it comes under the category of "quite hypothetical". If the finds were from a cu...
Miriam Griffiths A Little Help...
22 November 2024
Hypothetically, a great thing - and indeed I thought so when I first heard of it several years ago. ...
Bounty Hunter Seeds Tomato Seeds.
02 November 2024
Thank you for taking the time to share such valuable insights! This post is packed with helpful info...
Miriam Griffiths Blog Pause...
01 November 2024
Hope you have a most wonderful time! One day, I really should get organised and join you.
Katrin Cardboard Churches!
18 October 2024
I didn't know there's foldable models - I will have a look into that, thank you!

Sad news.

As an archaeologist, I get itchy when I see any original finds on sale anywhere. Itchy, and sometimes also a little bit angry, and always a good bit sad. Removing finds, taking them out of the soil, destroys irrevocally some knowledge that we could have gained about an area, a find spot, a development. This can be true even if they were stray finds that turn up on top of a field that had been ploughed.

Selling original artefacts supports the market for original artefacts. It does not matter where they come from, and it does not matter whether they are expensive or cheap, stray finds or not - everyone that buys or sells artefacts strengthens the market, and the stronger the market is, the more attention it gets, the more treasure hunters will go and try to find (and sell) stuff.

This destroys archaeological sites. It can even destroy more - such as this Roman bridge in Bulgaria that collapsed due to treasure hunters trying to find a gold treasure supposedly buried at or near the bridge.

I am out of words about this. Our world is one Roman bridge poorer because some people know no boundaries in their greed for treasure. Sometimes, I have a hard time to believe in humanity.
0
Friday Linky Stuff Round-Up.
News from Lyon.
 

Comments 1

Catherine Raymond (website) on Thursday, 17 March 2016 18:41

It *is* sad. It may even be the case that there is no treasure (or that any treasure was taken in antiquity), so that the destruction may not only have been caused by greed, but may have been pointless even from the treasure hunters' view.

I just ran across an article with a different kind of sad news. It's about the ruin of a 9th century CE castle in Spain that was crudely "restored" with concrete: you can read the article here>.

It *is* sad. It may even be the case that there is no treasure (or that any treasure was taken in antiquity), so that the destruction may not only have been caused by greed, but may have been pointless even from the treasure hunters' view. I just ran across an article with a different kind of sad news. It's about the ruin of a 9th century CE castle in Spain that was crudely "restored" with concrete: you can read the article here>.
Already Registered? Login Here
Friday, 22 November 2024

Related Posts

Contact