Latest Comments

Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
18 September 2026
Hi Rachel, I have looked for more photos of you, but that was not very successful. I found a link on...
Guest - Beatrix Sprang Discussion
15 September 2026
That lozenge pattern element is not a photograph, but a scan. So it should be to scale. But I pinned...
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
15 September 2026
I was not referring to Rachel's reconstruction (is the reconstruction you refer to the one photograp...
Guest - Beatrix Sprang Discussion
14 September 2026
There is something Rachel did not mention. She told me: "Well, I worked with the measurements we too...
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
14 September 2026
Well, this is certainly developing into an interesting discussion. Firstly, going from that lovely l...

More sunscreen? Here's why.

I remember, when I was a child, that we did use sunscreen when out on a bright summer''s day. Sunscreen with factor...4. 

Then. later, there was 8. Then there was 16. From some point, you'd not see the factor 4 in the drugstore shelves anymore; instead, there was factor 20, 30, and then even 50.

It's not just that people are inside more, and thus need more protection when they are going outside. There's a need for more protection because there's more UV around. A recent study shows this very, very clearly, and the whole thing is freely accessible here in English. If you prefer German, here's an article in the Spiegel that's more or less a very short summary. 

0
Archaeological Textile Study Day, online.
Spurious Correlations.
 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Monday, 21 September 2026

Related Posts

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://pallia.net/

Contact