Latest Comments

Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
18 September 2026
Hi Rachel, I have looked for more photos of you, but that was not very successful. I found a link on...
Guest - Beatrix Sprang Discussion
15 September 2026
That lozenge pattern element is not a photograph, but a scan. So it should be to scale. But I pinned...
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
15 September 2026
I was not referring to Rachel's reconstruction (is the reconstruction you refer to the one photograp...
Guest - Beatrix Sprang Discussion
14 September 2026
There is something Rachel did not mention. She told me: "Well, I worked with the measurements we too...
Guest - Katrin Sprang Discussion
14 September 2026
Well, this is certainly developing into an interesting discussion. Firstly, going from that lovely l...

Off and away!

3I'm off to a workshop in Sweden, so I'll spend tonight in a nice night train bed, to arrive way up north the next morning. I'm already looking forward to this a huge lot!

There will be no blog posts until Monday - but until then, you might be as amused as I was by the fact that the numbering of rulers (as in kings, not the draw-a-straight-line-thingie) is not as uniquely identifying as one might thinks. At least I used to think so... until I stumbled across Rudolph. The first. Or third. Or sixth, all depending on what you are looking at. The German wikipedia article lists it up nicely in the first sentence....

I do confess I was a little annoyed as well. What do I call him when I write about his grave garments now? I.? III? Or something entirely different? At least there's not an abundance of Rudolphs with rags, that makes things easier...

0
Up North, and Back Again.
Archaeological Textile Study Day, online.
 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Already Registered? Login Here
Monday, 21 September 2026

Related Posts

By accepting you will be accessing a service provided by a third-party external to https://pallia.net/

Contact